‘Hamilton received cease and desist letters’

Date published: December 18 2019

Lewis-Hamilton-selfie-PA

Lewis Hamilton may be one of the biggest names in Formula 1 but even he was quashed under Bernie Ecclestone’s thumb, told to “cease and desist” using F1 images on his social media.

It is well known that Ecclestone, Formula 1’s previous boss, was extremely protective of his product, so much so that drivers weren’t allowed to post their own footage of what takes place out on track on social media.

It was all ruled by Ecclestone.

However, when Liberty Media took over the sport, they immediately relaxed those bans, leading to an increased Formula 1 presence on social media.

Speaking during the recent SportsPro OTT summit, F1’s head of digital Frank Arthofer revealed that such was Ecclestone’s hold that he sent Hamilton “cease and desist” letters.

“A great story that Sean Branches, who’s my boss and runs the business at F1 tells, is [about] when Liberty bought the business [and] one of his first meetings was a lunch with Lewis Hamilton,” RaceFans.net quotes him as having said.

“Lewis brought with him to that lunch a stack of ‘cease and desist’ letters from Bernie Ecclestone because Lewis was taking clips of his onboards and posting them on his Instagram channel.

“And Lewis Hamilton, as I’m sure most of the audience knows, is arguably the biggest star in the history of the sport and has a huge crossover potential across urban culture, music, lifestyle.

“Working with the drivers and the teams in a more collaborative way to build the sport we think benefits not just Formula 1 but our partners, be that sponsors, broadcast partners and promoters.

“[It] is a really, really important component of the strategy and probably something we’re still in the early stages of doing well.”

Liberty has given the drivers and teams more freedom on social media.

“F1 as of January 2017 was a 66-year-old business and a terrific brand, built largely by Bernie Ecclestone as the owner and proprietor of the business for for 40-odd years,” said Arthofer.

“The Liberty thesis for buying F1 was best summed up in three areas. First it’s a global asset, which is an opportunity and a challenge, certainly, but I think in a world in which growth areas for many players and participants along the value chain is increasingly becoming a global proposition, the feeling was that there was an untapped opportunity and that it was well-situated for the future of the business.

“The second is the increasing value of live sport in the marketplace and I think that applies in a media context, but also an experiential context. We race in 21 countries, 21 grands prix and I think the value that’s accruing in live experiences in the modern economy is increasing.

“The third component was to a degree the areas of focus that Bernie had. I think he did a terrific job monetising the businesses – it’s a $2 billion dollar revenue business – but equally, didn’t invest for the future. He probably didn’t invest in areas like digital, which aren’t necessarily as creative from a pure profit potential in the near-term, but have long-term potential.

“There’s an old joke that Bernie signs the back of cheques, not the front. The business was quite lean when we took over and we’ve invested in it in order to build long-term asset value.”

Follow us on Twitter @Planet_F1 and like our Facebook page.